Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Summary

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next benchmark comparison: Qwen3 Coder Next leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.7. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.009 vs $0.164. Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 8.62s vs 65.37s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 27.0%.

Recommended model: Qwen3 Coder Next - It has the best score here (5.1), while costing about 20.1x less than MiniMax M2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.7 5.1
Rank #151 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.5 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 27.0%
Flaky tests 9 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 7.900 0.165
Total Cost $0.164 $0.009
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.480 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 43,706 47,507
Output Tokens 109,495 3,584
Reasoning Tokens 330,814 0
Response Time (avg) 65.37s 8.62s
Response Time (max) 251.36s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 849.76s 129.37s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#151 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#135 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 7.9 6.3 83.3% 2 20.82s 612 286 45,344
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.6 10.0 0.0% 0 3.31s 645 1,321 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 4.5 2.1 66.7% 1 60.39s 21,104 740 9,713
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 45.14s 20,469 317 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 4.6 1.7 66.7% 2 7.48s 6,584 266 3,835
Qwen3 Coder Next 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.32s 7,758 246 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 237.27s 308 105,047 133,487
Qwen3 Coder Next 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 962ms 753 26 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 3.8 2.5 33.3% 1 6.63s 492 25 1,686
Qwen3 Coder Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.34s 498 152 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 7.5 10.0 50.0% 0 621ms 699 156 1,495
Qwen3 Coder Next 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 7.78s 684 63 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 11.21s 495 1,069 9,605
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 24.34s 678 571 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.35s 7,123 269 937
Qwen3 Coder Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.47s 8,364 255 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 80.79s 213 1,280 18,535
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 601ms 216 12 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair