Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Spark 1.3 (medium) vs Pareto

Pareto leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.8. Pareto has the lower benchmark cost at $1.172 vs $1.469. Pareto is faster at 31.51s vs 38.57s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#38
Total Output Tokens
319,264
Response Time (avg)
38.57s
Total Cost
$1.469
Rank
#34
Total Output Tokens
119,230
Response Time (avg)
31.51s
Total Cost
$1.172
Recommended model Pareto

It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Spark 1.3 Muse Spark 1.3 medium Release: 2026-09-02 Pareto Pareto none Release: 2026-09-18
Score 8.8 8.9
Rank #38 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 86.4%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.638 6.506
Total Cost $1.469 $1.172
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,177 110,734
Output Tokens 11,044 119,230
Reasoning Tokens 308,220 0
Response Time (avg) 38.57s 31.51s
Response Time (max) 219.77s 143.33s
Response Time (total) 848.59s 693.29s
Parameters ~1T total (~50B active) -
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#38 Muse Spark 1.3

medium
Cost
$0.025
Time
113.4s
Tokens
5,952 tok

#34 Pareto

none
Cost
$0.034
Time
170.7s
Tokens
4,581 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.3 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 41.14s 7,275 1,182 46,737
Pareto 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 50.12s 7,471 1,949 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair