Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 Max (medium) vs Pareto

Qwen3.8 Max (medium) leads on average score with 9.0 vs 8.9. Qwen3.8 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.771 vs $1.172. Qwen3.8 Max (medium) is faster at 23.34s vs 31.51s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#29
Total Output Tokens
92,047
Response Time (avg)
23.34s
Total Cost
$0.771
Rank
#34
Total Output Tokens
119,230
Response Time (avg)
31.51s
Total Cost
$1.172
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (medium)

It has the best score here (9.0), while costing about 1.5x less than Pareto.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max medium Release: 2026-08-04 Pareto Pareto none Release: 2026-09-18
Score 9.0 8.9
Rank #29 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 86.4%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.532 6.506
Total Cost $0.771 $1.172
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 109,055 110,734
Output Tokens 6,566 119,230
Reasoning Tokens 85,481 0
Response Time (avg) 23.34s 31.51s
Response Time (max) 126.60s 143.33s
Response Time (total) 513.47s 693.29s
Parameters 2.4T total (~100B active) -
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#29 Qwen3.8 Max

medium
Cost
$0.028
Time
71.9s
Tokens
4,750 tok

#34 Pareto

none
Cost
$0.034
Time
170.7s
Tokens
4,581 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 41.35s 7,893 430 23,804
Pareto 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 50.12s 7,471 1,949 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair