Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.073. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 9.85s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 48.5%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0Its score stays close to the best score here (6.3 vs 6.4), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15.

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 6.3 6.4
Rank #111 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 48.5%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.627 0.751
Total Cost $0.044 $0.073
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,743 102,646
Output Tokens 9,372 29,370
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.18s 9.85s
Response Time (max) 48.38s 123.00s
Response Time (total) 113.95s 157.63s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#107 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair