Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 6.6. LongCat 2.0 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 10.13s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 86.4%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 14.7x faster than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24
Score 6.6 9.3
Rank #97 #6
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 86.4%
Flaky tests 5 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.202 6.594
Total Cost $0.469 $1.253
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,357 80,058
Output Tokens 30,466 5,378
Reasoning Tokens 336,325 23,040
Response Time (avg) 148.73s 10.13s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 56.19s
Response Time (total) 3272.00s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#6 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair