Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.476. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 25.56s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 60.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#101
Total Output Tokens
135,861
Response Time (avg)
25.56s
Total Cost
$0.476
Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
19,257
Response Time (avg)
7.82s
Total Cost
$0.231
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.7), while costing about 2.1x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #101 #107
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 60.6%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.319 2.061
Total Cost $0.476 $0.231
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,499 106,339
Output Tokens 135,861 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 25.56s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 335.41s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 562.43s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#101 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
29.0s
Tokens
3,439 tok

#107 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 22.52s 7,893 22,440 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair