Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.487. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.77s vs 26.01s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
139,572
Response Time (avg)
26.01s
Total Cost
$0.487
Rank
#146
Total Output Tokens
24,323
Response Time (avg)
4.77s
Total Cost
$0.058
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.7), while costing about 8.4x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #139 #146
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 8 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.419 0.678
Total Cost $0.487 $0.058
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,508 102,325
Output Tokens 139,572 24,323
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 26.01s 4.77s
Response Time (max) 335.41s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 572.22s 105.00s
Parameters ~700B total (~72B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
29.0s
Tokens
3,439 tok

#146 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 22.52s 7,893 22,440 0
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair