Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.467. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) is faster at 24.04s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium)It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 2.5x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #85 #88
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 66.7%
Flaky tests 7 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.237 3.218
Total Cost $0.467 $0.187
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,907 139,883
Output Tokens 7,213 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 128,251 130,992
Response Time (avg) 24.04s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 257.00s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 528.92s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#85 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
25.6s
Tokens
2,939 tok

#88 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair