Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra

Summary

GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.246 vs $0.496. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is faster at 6.69s vs 12.30s, with pass rates of 63.5% vs 68.3%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Terra (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 1.8x faster than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #53 #39
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.5% 68.3%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.228 3.815
Total Cost $0.246 $0.496
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,750 34,218
Output Tokens 2,509 1,982
Reasoning Tokens 69,594 25,370
Response Time (avg) 12.30s 6.69s
Response Time (max) 95.65s 41.68s
Response Time (total) 258.34s 140.49s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

#39 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Cost
$0.035
Time
16.3s
Tokens
2,418 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair