Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.246 vs $2.053. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) is faster at 12.30s vs 25.89s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 8.4x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #50 #53
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 63.5%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 17.103 2.228
Total Cost $2.053 $0.246
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 53,227 42,750
Output Tokens 47,446 2,509
Reasoning Tokens 24,000 69,594
Response Time (avg) 25.89s 12.30s
Response Time (max) 83.40s 95.65s
Response Time (total) 362.49s 258.34s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#50 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair