#50 Claude Opus 4.6
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Summary
The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.246 vs $2.053. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) is faster at 12.30s vs 25.89s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 63.5%.
Last updated at: 2026-07-14
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Rank | #50 | #53 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 61.9% | 63.5% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 5 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 17.103 | 2.228 |
| Total Cost | $2.053 | $0.246 |
| Input Price | $5.000 / 1M | $0.740 / 1M |
| Output Price | $25.000 / 1M | $2.960 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 53,227 | 42,750 |
| Output Tokens | 47,446 | 2,509 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 24,000 | 69,594 |
| Response Time (avg) | 25.89s | 12.30s |
| Response Time (max) | 83.40s | 95.65s |
| Response Time (total) | 362.49s | 258.34s |
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 44.4% | 1 | 30.10s | 8,522 | 13,057 | 4,121 | |
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 |
Switch Comparison Pair