Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

Summary

Claude Opus 4.8 (low) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.246 vs $1.270. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) is faster at 10.83s vs 12.30s, with pass rates of 79.4% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.7), while costing about 5.2x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #47 #53
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 79.4% 63.5%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 8.466 2.228
Total Cost $1.270 $0.246
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 60,946 42,750
Output Tokens 31,771 2,509
Reasoning Tokens 6,831 69,594
Response Time (avg) 10.83s 12.30s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 95.65s
Response Time (total) 227.39s 258.34s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#47 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair