Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Summary

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.6. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.246 vs $0.258. GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) is faster at 6.70s vs 12.30s, with pass rates of 63.5% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Luna (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.6 vs 7.7), while responding about 1.8x faster than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna medium Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.7 7.6
Rank #53 #57
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.5% 63.5%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.228 1.978
Total Cost $0.246 $0.258
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,750 35,699
Output Tokens 2,509 2,148
Reasoning Tokens 69,594 34,740
Response Time (avg) 12.30s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 95.65s 29.85s
Response Time (total) 258.34s 140.62s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

#57 GPT-5.6 Luna

medium
Cost
$0.014
Time
14.6s
Tokens
2,362 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,302 564 9,928

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair