Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 4.9. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.037. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 3.72s vs 6.99s, with pass rates of 38.1% vs 47.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 27BIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 1.9x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 4.9 5.5
Rank #168 #145
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.1 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 38.1% 47.6%
Flaky tests 7 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.724 0.467
Total Cost $0.037 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 41,328 52,721
Output Tokens 49,933 3,812
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.99s 3.72s
Response Time (max) 24.94s 11.82s
Response Time (total) 146.78s 78.08s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#168 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
14.5s
Tokens
2,619 tok

#145 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.3 9.6 0.0% 0 14.31s 6,472 16,918 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair