Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Last updated at: 2026-05-28

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #66 #65
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 73.3%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 60 60
Cost per result 0.000 4.865
Total Cost $0.033 $0.368
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.139 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Tokens 21,752 31,242
Reasoning Tokens 42,754 330,546
Response Time (avg) 61.29s 69.66s
Response Time (max) 304.19s 409.98s
Response Time (total) 1164.50s 1393.17s

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 42.21s 3,833 4,891
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.13s 798 42,652
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 59.65s 1,369 3,985
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 244.54s 14,456 88,431
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 304.19s 324 6,088
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 4.7 1.6 66.7% 1 75.34s 775 12,485
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 37.36s 840 1,937
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.3 5.9 83.3% 1 59.33s 235 19,493
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 64.92s 9,744 15,013
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 4.1 4.4 44.5% 2 88.34s 41 46,368
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 4.1 10.0 0.0% 0 58.26s 150 583
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 30.30s 20 3,753
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.78s 266 1,831
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 24.45s 97 17,361
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 20.73s 697 2,479
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 33.13s 3,592 26,585
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 104.44s 234 1,531
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.65s 309 1,365
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 113.91s 4,295 4,416
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 177.35s 10,919 72,053

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Opus 4.8nonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumRing-2.6-1TnonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumClaude Opus 4.8nonevsRing-2.6-1TmediumRing-2.6-1TmediumvsQwen3.6 Max PreviewnoneGPT-5.3 ChatnonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumRing-2.6-1TmediumvsGPT-5.3 ChatnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsRing-2.6-1TmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsRing-2.6-1TmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsRing-2.6-1TmediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium