Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 6.2. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.661 vs $0.837. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#71
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
8.12s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#130
Total Output Tokens
826,670
Response Time (avg)
112.47s
Total Cost
$0.837
Recommended model Claude Sonnet 4.6

It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 13.9x faster than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.3 6.2
Rank #71 #130
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 66.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 9.130
Total Cost $0.661 $0.837
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 130,388
Output Tokens 19,362 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#130 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair