- Rank
- #222
- Total Output Tokens
- 704,170
- Response Time (avg)
- 85.22s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Space Bunny Alpha (high)
Space Bunny Alpha (high) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 6.3. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Space Bunny Alpha (high) is faster at 29.38s vs 85.22s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 63.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #120
- Total Output Tokens
- 181,271
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Space Bunny Alpha (high)
It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 2.9x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (low).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low | Space Bunny Alpha Space Bunny Alpha high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.3 | 7.5 |
| Rank | #222 | #120 |
| Reliability | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 66.7% | 63.8% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 271,890 | 302,228 |
| Output Tokens | 190,841 | 181,271 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 513,329 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 85.22s | 29.38s |
| Response Time (max) | 432.81s | 234.56s |
| Response Time (total) | 1960.12s | 675.79s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | - |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 133.5s
- Tokens
- 12,950 tok
#120 Space Bunny Alpha
high- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 76.4s
- Tokens
- 8,935 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 73.43s | 164,819 | 11,116 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 2 | 3.48s | 2,130 | 3,125 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.2 | 7.1 | 55.6% | 1 | 8.29s | 8,493 | 8,006 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 19.30s | 103,428 | 15,087 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 7,890 | 590 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 85.05s | 1,869 | 66,726 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.75s | 855 | 1,038 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.04s | 1,425 | 719 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 8.3 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.43s | 1,782 | 5,175 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.34s | 8,961 | 471 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 234.56s | 576 | 69,218 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Space Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsSpace Bunny AlphahighGPT-6 LunalowvsSpace Bunny AlphahighSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsSpace Bunny AlphahighLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423nonevsLing 3.1 FlashlowLing 3.1 FlashlowvsGrok 4.20medium