Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.971. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) is faster at 85.22s vs 111.54s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#222
Total Output Tokens
704,170
Response Time (avg)
85.22s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#215
Total Output Tokens
921,628
Response Time (avg)
111.54s
Total Cost
$0.971
Recommended model Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low Release: 2026-10-03 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #222 #215
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.8 7.5
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 65.2%
Flaky tests 6 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 10.505
Total Cost $0.000 $0.971
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.050 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 271,890 378,048
Output Tokens 190,841 56,477
Reasoning Tokens 513,329 865,151
Response Time (avg) 85.22s 111.54s
Response Time (max) 432.81s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 1960.12s 2565.38s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) 35B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#222 Ling 3.1 Flash

low
Cost
$0.000
Time
133.5s
Tokens
12,950 tok

#215 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 5.6 4.2 66.7% 2 107.30s 8,298 20,816 86,330
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair