Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.041. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 4.03s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 42.4%.

Recommended modelGLM 5It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #149 #148
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 42.4%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.263
Total Cost $0.000 $0.041
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 37,135
Output Tokens 12,783 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 56.37s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#148 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair