Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next (medium)

Ling 3.0 Flash leads on average score with 5.2 vs 4.7. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.071. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.40s vs 16.97s, with pass rates of 26.1% vs 24.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-02

Compared models

Rank
#289
Total Output Tokens
12,777
Response Time (avg)
3.40s
Total Cost
$0.004
Rank
#323
Total Output Tokens
40,395
Response Time (avg)
16.97s
Total Cost
$0.071
Recommended model Ling 3.0 Flash

It has the best score here (5.2), while costing about 20.5x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.2 4.7
Rank #289 #323
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 26.1% 24.6%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 2.280
Total Cost $0.004 $0.071
Input Price $0.021 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Output Price $0.063 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.005 / 1M $0.070 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 123,993 311,647
Output Tokens 12,777 40,395
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.40s 16.97s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 151.35s
Response Time (total) 74.77s 305.55s
Parameters 124B total (5.1B active) 80B total (3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#289 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#323 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling 3.0 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninghighFree AvailableLing 3.0 FlashnonevsInkling SmalllowFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing 3.0 FlashnonevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5highDeepSeek V3.2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing 3.0 FlashnonevsMistral Small 4mediumNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder Nextmedium