- Rank
- #322
- Total Output Tokens
- 86,367
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.05s
- Total Cost
- $0.023
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Laguna S 2.1 (high)
Laguna S 2.1 (high) leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.7. Mercury 2.5 Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.023 vs $0.145. Mercury 2.5 Preview is faster at 7.05s vs 113.63s, with pass rates of 29.0% vs 27.5%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #313
- Total Output Tokens
- 630,543
- Response Time (avg)
- 113.63s
- Total Cost
- $0.145
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Its score stays close to the best score here (4.7 vs 4.9), while costing about 6.3x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 Preview Mercury 2.5 Preview none | Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 4.9 |
| Rank | #322 | #313 |
| Reliability | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 29.0% | 27.5% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.559 | 3.664 |
| Total Cost | $0.023 | $0.145 |
| Input Price | $0.040 / 1M | $0.090 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.180 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.009 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 250,541 | 344,806 |
| Output Tokens | 86,367 | 177,330 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 453,213 |
| Response Time (avg) | 7.05s | 113.63s |
| Response Time (max) | 84.96s | 1190.11s |
| Response Time (total) | 162.25s | 2613.48s |
| Parameters | ~100B | 118B total (8B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Weights available |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#322 Mercury 2.5 Preview
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 3.3s
- Tokens
- 3,122 tok
#313 Laguna S 2.1
high- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 6.8s
- Tokens
- 1,389 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.9 | 9.6 | 0.0% | 0 | 84.96s | 120,245 | 3,782 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 158.25s | 135,869 | 1,742 | 43,937 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.8 | 8.3 | 16.7% | 1 | 655ms | 812 | 256 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.4 | 5.8 | 25.0% | 2 | 52.20s | 672 | 504 | 46,579 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 4.7 | 7.9 | 22.2% | 1 | 459ms | 7,850 | 650 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 271.42s | 6,496 | 59,355 | 151,009 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 31.28s | 101,129 | 80,273 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 16.7% | 1 | 702.26s | 184,420 | 114,577 | 203,826 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.04s | 8,333 | 672 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.96s | 7,689 | 243 | 1,705 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 631ms | 875 | 40 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.51s | 771 | 24 | 2,035 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 482ms | 544 | 85 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 4.6 | 9.8 | 0.0% | 0 | 855ms | 513 | 135 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.26s | 753 | 73 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 4.6 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 453ms | 702 | 60 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.6 | 7.4 | 44.4% | 1 | 684ms | 796 | 292 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 1.62s | 699 | 370 | 1,130 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.29s | 8,969 | 229 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.69s | 6,747 | 306 | 334 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 419ms | 235 | 15 | 0 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.94s | 228 | 14 | 2,658 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextnoneLing 2.6 1tnonevsLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailableLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.5noneLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsInkling SmallnoneFree AvailableLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BnoneLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsHy4 previewnoneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowvsLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailableGPT-4o-mininonevsLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailableDots 3 Note PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1highFree Available