Navigate
Advertise here

Granite 4.1 8B vs Jev 1.13

Granite 4.1 8B leads on average score with 4.0 vs 3.2. Jev 1.13 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.003 vs $0.007. Jev 1.13 is faster at 698ms vs 1.44s, with pass rates of 9.1% vs 27.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#315
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.44s
Total Cost
$0.007
Rank
#328
Total Output Tokens
18,927
Response Time (avg)
698ms
Total Cost
$0.003
Recommended model Granite 4.1 8B

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01 Jev 1.13 Jev 1.13 none Release: 2026-09-18
Score 4.0 3.2
Rank #315 #328
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 5.5
Attempts 66/66 36/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 9.1% 27.3%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 36
Cost per result 0.315 0.047
Total Cost $0.007 $0.003
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $0.042 / 1M
Output Price $0.100 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,836 67,092
Output Tokens 5,996 18,927
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.44s 698ms
Response Time (max) 16.67s 1.08s
Response Time (total) 31.75s 8.38s
Parameters 8B -
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#315 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

#328 Jev 1.13

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0
Jev 1.13 2.2 6.7 0.0% 0 598ms 30,072 8,130 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair