Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B (medium) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.3. Gemma 4 31B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.116 vs $0.680. Gemma 4 31B (medium) is faster at 75.38s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 31B (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.3 vs 6.5), while costing about 5.9x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.3 6.5
Rank #121 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 59.1%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 7.319
Total Cost $0.116 $0.680
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 106,167
Output Tokens 34,468 32,889
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 241,303
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 106.32s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 1085.11s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 2339.12s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#109 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair