Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

The average score is effectively tied at 5.5 vs 5.5. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.068. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 4.12s vs 7.64s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 37.9%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-ProIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 1.9x faster than Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.5 5.5
Rank #162 #160
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 37.9%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.235 1.509
Total Cost $0.015 $0.068
Input Price $0.070 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,282 124,799
Output Tokens 15,781 15,362
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.64s 4.12s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 167.98s 90.55s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#160 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair