Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#89
Total Output Tokens
117,518
Response Time (avg)
9.93s
Total Cost
$1.079
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
97,816
Response Time (avg)
21.91s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash

It has the best score here (7.0), while responding about 2.2x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 7.0 6.1
Rank #89 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 50.0%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 0.221
Total Cost $1.079 $0.019
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 108,747
Output Tokens 117,518 29,772
Reasoning Tokens 0 68,044
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 21.91s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 328.70s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#89 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#135 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair