Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 6.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.300 vs $1.116. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 87.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 Max (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 6.8 9.2
Rank #96 #13
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 87.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 8.292
Total Cost $0.300 $1.116
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 106,020
Output Tokens 16,454 5,748
Reasoning Tokens 0 211,004
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 40.57s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 556.06s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 892.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#13 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair