Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) vs Pareto

Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.0 vs 8.9. Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.665 vs $1.172. Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is faster at 8.48s vs 31.51s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#27
Total Output Tokens
62,173
Response Time (avg)
8.48s
Total Cost
$0.665
Rank
#34
Total Output Tokens
119,230
Response Time (avg)
31.51s
Total Cost
$1.172
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (9.0), while costing about 1.8x less than Pareto.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-19 Pareto Pareto none Release: 2026-09-18
Score 9.0 8.9
Rank #27 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 86.4%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.690 6.506
Total Cost $0.665 $1.172
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 69,756 110,734
Output Tokens 2,166 119,230
Reasoning Tokens 60,007 0
Response Time (avg) 8.48s 31.51s
Response Time (max) 76.68s 143.33s
Response Time (total) 186.57s 693.29s
Parameters ~500B total (~20B active) -
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#27 Gemini 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.201
Time
112.9s
Tokens
22,371 tok

#34 Pareto

none
Cost
$0.034
Time
170.7s
Tokens
4,581 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.9 7.5 77.8% 1 12.63s 8,118 461 24,939
Pareto 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 50.12s 7,471 1,949 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair