Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.524. GPT-5.6 Sol is faster at 2.16s vs 2.25s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.9), while costing about 3.6x less than GPT-5.6 Sol.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol none Release: 2026-07-09
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #95 #87
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 59.1%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 4.761
Total Cost $0.145 $0.524
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 78,593
Output Tokens 15,302 4,357
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 0
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 2.16s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 12.81s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 47.62s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#87 GPT-5.6 Sol

none
Cost
$0.116
Time
78.7s
Tokens
3,944 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
GPT-5.6 Sol 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,302 390 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair