- Rank
- #25
- Total Output Tokens
- 204,625
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.05s
- Total Cost
- $0.540
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (high) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) leads on average score with 9.4 vs 8.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.540 vs $0.723. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (high) is faster at 10.05s vs 12.63s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 90.9%.
- Rank
- #8
- Total Output Tokens
- 34,977
- Response Time (avg)
- 12.63s
- Total Cost
- $0.723
Recommended model
GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high | GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Rank | #25 | #8 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 83.3% | 90.9% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 3.174 | 8.025 |
| Total Cost | $0.540 | $0.723 |
| Input Price | $0.300 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
| Output Price | $2.500 / 1M | $15.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 93,046 | 79,006 |
| Output Tokens | 5,884 | 4,696 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 198,741 | 30,281 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.05s | 12.63s |
| Response Time (max) | 36.22s | 79.40s |
| Response Time (total) | 221.06s | 277.88s |
| Parameters | ~150B total (~10B active) | ~2T total (~150B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#25 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
high- Cost
- $0.025
- Time
- 36.8s
- Tokens
- 9,964 tok
#8 GPT-5.6 Sol
medium- Cost
- $0.124
- Time
- 57.2s
- Tokens
- 4,199 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.96s | 498 | 142 | 7,917 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.81s | 606 | 173 | 572 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 16.58s | 8,130 | 434 | 57,369 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.40s | 7,302 | 394 | 4,706 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 27.90s | 68,427 | 4,360 | 52,993 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 17.65s | 55,798 | 3,119 | 2,616 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.17s | 7,362 | 279 | 5,636 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.38s | 7,140 | 222 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.14s | 656 | 17 | 54,566 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 57.24s | 732 | 71 | 20,480 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.10s | 488 | 81 | 2,124 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.48s | 477 | 99 | 214 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.16s | 625 | 69 | 3,513 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.50s | 660 | 96 | 249 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.09s | 572 | 183 | 4,004 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 2.98s | 642 | 228 | 566 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.55s | 6,132 | 310 | 2,955 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 5,454 | 264 | 361 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 9.68s | 156 | 9 | 7,664 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.94s | 195 | 30 | 517 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighClaude Opus 5lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighGPT-5.6 SolmediumvsGrok 4.6highGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsMuse Spark 1.2mediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsMuse Spark 1.1mediumClaude Fable 5mediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighGemini 3.7 FlashlowvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumClaude Opus 5highvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsQwen3.6 Max Previewmedium