Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 2.1x faster than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 9.5 6.5
Rank #4 #111
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 69.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 3.124
Total Cost $1.976 $0.082
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 105,447
Output Tokens 8,777 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 230,682
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#111 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair