Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 7.4. LongCat 2.0 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.478 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 9.1x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20
Score 9.5 7.4
Rank #2 #60
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 3.978
Total Cost $1.976 $0.478
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 97,315
Output Tokens 8,777 44,384
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 329,012
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 136.64s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 939.52s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 3006.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#60 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair