Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 6.6. LongCat 2.0 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 53.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 9.9x faster than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20
Score 9.5 6.6
Rank #2 #97
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.3 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 53.0%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 5.202
Total Cost $1.976 $0.469
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 93,357
Output Tokens 8,777 30,466
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 336,325
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 148.73s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 941.66s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 3272.00s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#97 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair