Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.4 vs 6.5. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.052 vs $0.058. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is faster at 1.58s vs 4.76s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewIt has the best score here (6.4), while responding about 3.0x faster than Qwen3.5-27B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.4 6.5
Rank #101 #98
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 40.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.431 0.763
Total Cost $0.052 $0.058
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 120,942 102,316
Output Tokens 14,292 24,321
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.58s 4.76s
Response Time (max) 9.27s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 34.72s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#101 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair