Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.019. Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 6.20s vs 10.06s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
1,890
Response Time (avg)
6.20s
Total Cost
$0.017
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Gemini 2.5 Flash

It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 1.6x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #132 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 36.4%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.186 0.262
Total Cost $0.017 $0.019
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,877 218,731
Output Tokens 1,890 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.20s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 136.37s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#132 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair