Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.6. DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.247. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is faster at 12.92s vs 36.78s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 33.3%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (5.6 vs 5.7), while costing about 5.7x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 5.6 5.7
Rank #156 #148
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 33.3%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 4.182
Total Cost $0.044 $0.247
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 240,221 241,566
Output Tokens 100,727 88,458
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 36.78s 12.92s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 212.63s
Response Time (total) 809.09s 284.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#148 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair