Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.3. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.021 vs $0.061. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 20.70s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#182
Total Output Tokens
25,424
Response Time (avg)
20.70s
Total Cost
$0.021
Rank
#185
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 3.7x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 none Release: 2026-08-01 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.3
Rank #182 #185
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.509 1.496
Total Cost $0.021 $0.061
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,557 93,979
Output Tokens 25,424 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 20.70s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 387.15s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 455.38s 110.40s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#182 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
198.4s
Tokens
14,316 tok

#185 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 1.72s 7,275 505 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair