Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.0. DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.054 vs $0.087. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 18.25s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 27BIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 1.7x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.0 5.5
Rank #165 #145
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 45.5%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 1.220
Total Cost $0.054 $0.087
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 95,796
Output Tokens 42,097 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 234.39s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#145 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair