Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.0. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $1.046. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) is faster at 64.16s vs 68.62s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V3.2 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.1), while costing about 13.6x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.0 7.1
Rank #73 #69
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.671 8.509
Total Cost $0.078 $1.046
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,047 124,771
Output Tokens 11,834 44,077
Reasoning Tokens 117,014 443,141
Response Time (avg) 68.62s 64.16s
Response Time (max) 376.10s 519.30s
Response Time (total) 1509.53s 1411.60s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#73 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

#69 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair