Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen3.6 27B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.440. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 2.49s vs 59.71s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 60.3%.

Recommended model: Seed-2.0-Lite - Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.6), while costing about 24.2x less than Qwen3.6 27B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.6
Rank #92 #81
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 60.3%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.228 3.361
Total Cost $0.019 $0.440
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.289 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $3.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,573 39,376
Output Tokens 3,259 16,189
Reasoning Tokens 0 122,521
Response Time (avg) 2.49s 59.71s
Response Time (max) 6.70s 168.22s
Response Time (total) 52.26s 1254.01s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#92 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#81 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 5.9 16.7% 2 2.43s 894 709 0
Qwen3.6 27B 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 12.62s 453 582 4,311
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.59s 16,215 498 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.0 3.7 66.7% 1 83.07s 15,104 2,088 14,689
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.82s 8,538 246 0
Qwen3.6 27B 3.5 1.4 50.0% 2 37.30s 7,778 568 9,404
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 1.33s 939 17 0
Qwen3.6 27B 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 73.38s 662 3,510 20,352
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.45s 570 294 0
Qwen3.6 27B 6.5 3.4 66.7% 1 39.53s 516 81 3,045
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.06s 810 73 0
Qwen3.6 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 37.96s 699 346 6,548
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 2.78s 858 709 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 61.14s 696 255 12,044
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.94s 9,270 292 0
Qwen3.6 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 16.88s 8,213 390 2,954
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.96s 264 11 0
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 80.99s 204 401 5,807

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair