Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code (medium) vs GLM 5.2

Seed-2.0-Code (medium) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $1.153. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 101.05s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#129
Total Output Tokens
371,443
Response Time (avg)
101.05s
Total Cost
$1.153
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.078
Recommended model GLM 5.2

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.8), while costing about 14.9x less than Seed-2.0-Code (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code medium Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.8 6.7
Rank #129 #136
Reliability 7.3 10.0
Consistency 7.3 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.524 1.312
Total Cost $1.153 $0.078
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.490 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $1.540 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 76,036 112,458
Output Tokens 7,267 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 364,176 0
Response Time (avg) 101.05s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 626.58s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 2223.19s 212.38s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#129 Seed-2.0-Code

medium
Cost
$0.026
Time
122.8s
Tokens
8,630 tok

#136 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 8.9 7.8 88.9% 1 89.94s 8,247 496 44,062
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair