Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Summary

Cobuddy vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B benchmark comparison: Cobuddy leads on average score with 5.6 vs 4.6. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.031. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 3.73s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 30.2%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.6 35B A3B - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (4.6), faster response than Cobuddy, and balanced cost.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 4.6
Rank #120 #154
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 30.2%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.754
Total Cost $0.000 $0.031
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 19,329
Output Tokens 1,677 27,755
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 3.73s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 22.52s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 70.86s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#120 Cobuddy

medium
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#154 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.6 7.6 16.7% 1 2.10s 696 1,571 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.46s 7,788 248 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 7.45s 781 11,381 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 4.4 3.0 33.3% 1 3.51s 520 1,545 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.86s 709 1,264 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 714 573 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 414ms 210 12 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair