Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 leads on average score with 5.3 vs 4.8. Laguna XS 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.008. Laguna XS 2.1 is faster at 1.55s vs 2.98s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelLaguna XS 2.1It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 1.9x faster than Trinity Large Preview.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-02 Free Available
Score 4.8 5.3
Rank #179 #156
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 0.143
Total Cost $0.008 $0.008
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 91,598
Output Tokens 2,169 13,377
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 1.55s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 19.02s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 34.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#156 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
27.6s
Tokens
4,344 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair