Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview (default) vs Mercury 2.5

Trinity Large Preview (default) leads on average score with 4.4 vs 4.1. Trinity Large Preview (default) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.026. Trinity Large Preview (default) is faster at 2.83s vs 5.10s, with pass rates of 20.3% vs 24.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-17

Compared models

Rank
#379
Total Output Tokens
2,169
Response Time (avg)
2.83s
Total Cost
$0.008
Rank
#388
Total Output Tokens
89,958
Response Time (avg)
5.10s
Total Cost
$0.026
Recommended model Trinity Large Preview (default)

It has the best score here (4.4), while costing about 3.3x less than Mercury 2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview default Release: 2026-01-27 Free Available Mercury 2.5 Mercury 2.5 none Release: 2026-09-08
Score 4.4 4.1
Rank #379 #388
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.6
Attempts 66/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 20.3% 24.6%
Flaky tests 2 7
Total Runs 66 69
Cost per result 0.017 1.298
Total Cost $0.008 $0.026
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.040 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.004 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 29,828 311,488
Output Tokens 2,169 89,958
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.83s 5.10s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 63.41s
Response Time (total) 56.65s 117.24s
Parameters 398B total (13B active) ~100B
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#379 Trinity Large Preview

default
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#388 Mercury 2.5

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
2.7s
Tokens
2,749 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Mercury 2.5 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 12.50s 7,888 61,297 0

Switch Comparison Pair