Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $1.976. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 15.07s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 93.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19
Score 4.8 9.5
Rank #179 #2
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 93.9%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 9.879
Total Cost $0.008 $1.976
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 107,137
Output Tokens 2,169 8,777
Reasoning Tokens 0 192,900
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 15.07s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 145.92s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 331.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair