Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 8.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $0.922. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) is faster at 9.48s vs 12.52s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 81.8%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.1 vs 8.3), while costing about 1.6x less than Claude Sonnet 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 medium Release: 2026-06-30 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21
Score 8.3 8.1
Rank #26 #31
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 81.8%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.760 4.169
Total Cost $0.922 $0.584
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,956 105,138
Output Tokens 52,333 8,315
Reasoning Tokens 10,874 212,507
Response Time (avg) 12.52s 9.48s
Response Time (max) 66.71s 43.93s
Response Time (total) 275.42s 208.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#26 Claude Sonnet 5

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
6.4s
Tokens
832 tok

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 9.0 7.9 88.9% 1 17.28s 10,590 13,153 2,379
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair