Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.0. Kimi K2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.600 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 99.00s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 4.6It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 12.2x faster than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27
Score 7.3 7.0
Rank #71 #85
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 1 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 4.789
Total Cost $0.661 $0.600
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.571 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $2.850 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 118,448
Output Tokens 19,362 62,124
Reasoning Tokens 0 165,243
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 99.00s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 281.00s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 1485.04s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#85 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair