Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Claude Opus 4.8 has the lower benchmark cost at $1.166 vs $1.627. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while responding about 22.8x faster than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #65 #58
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 72.7%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 8.324
Total Cost $1.166 $1.627
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 111,635
Output Tokens 16,797 15,999
Reasoning Tokens 0 598,430
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 111.94s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 2462.67s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#65 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#58 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair