Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $1.477. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 7.61s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#20
Total Output Tokens
29,990
Response Time (avg)
7.61s
Total Cost
$1.477
Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.4), lower cost than Claude Opus 4.7 (medium), and balanced response time.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 8.7 7.4
Rank #20 #67
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.201 1.582
Total Cost $1.477 $0.197
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 95,983
Output Tokens 24,948 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 0
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair