Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.4. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.143 vs $1.477. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#20
Total Output Tokens
29,990
Response Time (avg)
7.61s
Total Cost
$1.477
Rank
#25
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.143
Recommended model Claude Opus 4.7 (medium)

It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 8.9x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.7 8.4
Rank #20 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 80.3%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.201 8.173
Total Cost $1.477 $1.143
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 79,240
Output Tokens 24,948 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 164,842
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair