Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.7 vs 8.7. Qwen3.8 Max (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.687 vs $1.477. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 21.19s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 84.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-04

Rank
#22
Total Output Tokens
29,990
Response Time (avg)
7.61s
Total Cost
$1.477
Rank
#23
Total Output Tokens
81,411
Response Time (avg)
21.19s
Total Cost
$0.687
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (low)

It has the best score here (8.7), while costing about 2.1x less than Claude Opus 4.7 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max low Release: 2026-08-04
Score 8.7 8.7
Rank #22 #23
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 84.9%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.201 4.041
Total Cost $1.477 $0.687
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 99,172
Output Tokens 24,948 6,132
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 75,279
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 21.19s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 155.75s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 466.14s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#23 Qwen3.8 Max

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Qwen3.8 Max 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 28.69s 8,127 512 15,952

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair