Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Mini

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.5. GPT-5 Mini (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.159 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 4.73s vs 23.64s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelGPT-5 Mini (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.5 vs 8.7), while costing about 4.3x less than Claude Opus 4.7 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 8.7 8.5
Rank #16 #19
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 63.5%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 1.319
Total Cost $0.679 $0.159
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 37,100
Output Tokens 11,858 6,801
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 67,690
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 23.64s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 88.15s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 496.44s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#19 GPT-5 Mini

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
3,432 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GPT-5 Mini 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 27.63s 7,302 658 17,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair